|

























|
Forschung aktuell
Municipal
rationalisation: the territorial dimension of cooperative strategies in
public policy and local services
The
project will deal with the comparative analysis of territorial,
functional and political dimensions of intermunicipal cooperation and
amalgamation: both in Italy and in Germany there is an ongoing and
widespread debate on the possibility and presumed advantages of
cooperation or amalgamation that would let municipalities perform their
increasing tasks in more effective and efficient ways. Insufficient
attention, however, appears to be paid to the analysis of alternative
strategies (single- or multi-purpose cooperation, joint ventures,
public-public or public-private partnerships etc), to the political
underpinnings of the strategies proposed (or ignored), and to the
difficulties that reforms have come across on repeated occasions.
Especially failed reforms may signal that a power struggle between
government levels may be occurring, which would make considerations of
mere effectiveness and efficiency inadequate to understand the
complexity of the phenomenon.
Using a
political science and public policy method of research, investigating
processes and results in both countries, and analyzing the history of
the debate and initiative in the field, the project will pursue several
scientific objectives: the identification of the range and diffusion of
different types of cooperation and amalgamation, the analysis of their
respective implementation processes and outcomes, and the evaluation of
possible transfer of experiences from one country to the other. More
indirect objectives concern the analysis of local government in the two
countries, and of the strategies and resources that different actors use
to influence the reform processes: this will contribute both to the
fundamental, theoretical knowledge of Multilevel governance structures,
and to the evaluation of viable transfer from one country to another.
The fulfillment of these
objectives strongly depends on comparative analysis, which makes
exchange between the two research groups an invaluable asset.
 |
Stand:
05.10.2011
|
|